If we are to truly play our role as “Global Britain,” we must be more capable in new domains, enabling us to be active in more theatres”. This line of thought has gained some support at the highest reaches of Defence, with the Secretary of State, Ben Wallace, writing “ for too long we have had a sentimental attachment to a static, armoured centric force structure anchored in Europe”.Ĭommon to other arguments, Wallace’s basis for this is that “ our competition has spread out across the globe. The Times article summed up the commonly used arguments against heavy armour. Other familiar targets include the Red Arrows, the Queen Elizabeth class aircraft carriers, and the Royal Marines. A cynic might observe that stories like this are a routine part of the inter-service politics that marks every defence review. ![]() ![]() On 25 th August 2020, The Times published a story claiming that the forthcoming Integrated Defence and Security Review may see the British Army losing its Challenger 2 tanks in favour of other capabilities.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |